Would you take your baby to Glasto?

[*LovelyBubbly*]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6237064.stm

I cant help but think they are selfish..

[Themis]

I think its not really the place for a baby.

[Adelelee]

I would not take myself so would definately not take one of the kids.

It is personally my idea of HELL

[Twistarella]

Personally, I would, if I didn't have to camp in a tent!

Music and festivals were/are a big part of the scene DH and I were in to and I would love to take A to Glastonbury one year

[Abbie]

No way.

That place is my idea of hell, so unless I could stay in a 4* hotel, without a glimpse of mud or manky loos, I wouldn't be there in the first place

[Strawberry Bivi]

Yes, I would, after all when you buy the tickets you don't know the weather forecast. They have separate fields for families and lots to do for children.

[Woodstock]

When I was in my 20s, I loved Glastonbury. I have been there in rain, mud and blazing sunshine.

I dont think it is place for children, let alone a baby. Too much of a risk to their health and safety in my opinion, in many ways.

[Tazdevil]

i like my creature comforts too much, so wouldn't be there myself!!!! If the 'conditions' weren't as bad as they are I'd maybe consider it if I lived near etc.....but that's because Kaede loves her music!

I'd need an escape route though for when she kicked up!!!!

[Minky]

Absolutely not

I just don't think it's a suitable environment for children - lots of late night noise when they should be sleeping etc.

[noo noo]

Yes I would and have taken my two to festivals and will again this summer. I don't think its irresposible or selfish.